↓ Skip to main content

Abundance, arrangement, and function of sequence motifs in the chicken promoters

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Abundance, arrangement, and function of sequence motifs in the chicken promoters
Published in
BMC Genomics, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-900
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Eukaryotic promoters are regions containing various sequence motifs necessary to control gene transcription. Much evidence has emerged showing that structural and/or contextual changes in regulatory elements can critically affect cis-regulatory activity. As sequence motifs can be key factors in maintaining complex promoter architectures, one effective approach to further understand the evolution of promoter regions in vertebrates is to compare the abundance and distribution patterns of sequence motifs in these regions between divergent species. When compared with mammals, the chicken (Gallus gallus) has a very different genome composition and sufficient genomic information to make it a good model for the exploration of promoter structure and evolution.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 21%
Student > Master 7 15%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 9 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 26%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Psychology 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 9 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2014.
All research outputs
#19,945,185
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#8,135
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,726
of 268,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#202
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.