↓ Skip to main content

A two-year study using cerebral gray matter volume to assess the response to fingolimod therapy in multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Neurological Sciences, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A two-year study using cerebral gray matter volume to assess the response to fingolimod therapy in multiple sclerosis
Published in
Journal of the Neurological Sciences, October 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jns.2017.10.019
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Cerebral gray matter (GM) atrophy has clinical relevance in multiple sclerosis (MS). Fingolimod has known efficacy on clinical and conventional MRI findings in MS; the effect on GM is unknown. To explore fingolimod's treatment effect on cerebral GM atrophy over two years in patients with relapsing forms of MS. Patients starting fingolimod [n=24, age (mean±SD) 41.2±11.6years, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score 1.1±1.4; 58% women] were compared to untreated patients [n=29, age 45.7±8.4years, EDSS 1.0±1.2; 93% women]. Baseline, one and two year MRI was applied to an SPM12 pipeline to assess brain parenchymal fraction (BPF) and cortical GM fraction (cGMF). T2 lesion volume (T2LV) and gadolinium-enhancing lesions were assessed. Change was modeled using a mixed effects linear regression with a random intercept and fixed effects for time, group, and the time-by-group interaction. The group slope difference was assessed using the interaction term. Over two years, cGMF remained stable in the fingolimod group (p>0.05), but decreased in the untreated group (p<0.001) (group difference p<0.001). BPF change did not differ between groups (all time-points p>0.05). T2LV increased over two years in the untreated group (p<0.001) but not in the fingolimod group (p≥0.44) (group difference p<0.001). These results suggest a treatment effect of fingolimod on cerebral GM atrophy in the first two years. GM atrophy is more sensitive to such effects than whole brain atrophy. However, due to the non-randomized, retrospective design, heterogeneous between-group characteristics, and small sample size, these results require confirmation in future studies.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 13%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 18 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 28%
Neuroscience 8 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Psychology 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 24 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2017.
All research outputs
#14,605,790
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Neurological Sciences
#2,898
of 5,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,618
of 335,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Neurological Sciences
#60
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.