↓ Skip to main content

Sex, Age, and Hunger Regulate Behavioral Prioritization through Dynamic Modulation of Chemoreceptor Expression

Overview of attention for article published in Current Biology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
12 X users
weibo
2 weibo users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
4 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Sex, Age, and Hunger Regulate Behavioral Prioritization through Dynamic Modulation of Chemoreceptor Expression
Published in
Current Biology, October 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.032
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Adaptive behavioral prioritization requires flexible outputs from fixed neural circuits. In C. elegans, the prioritization of feeding versus mate searching depends on biological sex (males will abandon food to search for mates, whereas hermaphrodites will not) as well as developmental stage and feeding status. Previously, we found that males are less attracted than hermaphrodites to the food-associated odorant diacetyl, suggesting that sensory modulation may contribute to behavioral prioritization.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Canada 3 2%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 143 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 27%
Researcher 33 21%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Master 12 8%
Professor 8 5%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 25 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 21%
Neuroscience 24 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 4%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 26 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 98. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2026.
All research outputs
#533,829
of 32,960,374 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#1,942
of 16,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,570
of 290,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#25
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,960,374 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.