↓ Skip to main content

Disordered eating practices in gastrointestinal disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Appetite, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 X users
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
podcasts
3 podcasts

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Disordered eating practices in gastrointestinal disorders
Published in
Appetite, October 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.appet.2014.10.006
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To systematically review evidence concerning disordered eating practices in dietary-controlled gastrointestinal conditions. Three key questions were examined: a) are disordered eating practices a feature of GI disorders?; b) what abnormal eating practices are present in those with GI disorders?; and c) what factors are associated with the presence of disordered eating in those with GI disorders? By exploring these questions, we aim to develop a conceptual model of disordered eating development in GI disease.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 168 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Student > Master 20 12%
Other 10 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 64 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 19%
Psychology 22 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 6%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 68 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2026.
All research outputs
#1,505,399
of 34,399,322 outputs
Outputs from Appetite
#891
of 5,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,764
of 300,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Appetite
#16
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,399,322 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,515 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.