↓ Skip to main content

Fluoroquinolones and the Risk of Achilles Tendon Disorders: Update on a Neglected Complication

Overview of attention for article published in Urology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Fluoroquinolones and the Risk of Achilles Tendon Disorders: Update on a Neglected Complication
Published in
Urology, October 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.urology.2017.10.017
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Fluoroquinolones (FQ) has been considered the first-line therapy for uncomplicated urinary infections. It has been associated with Achilles tendon disorders, especially during the first month of treatment. To evaluate the current evidence and to identify associated risk factors which increase the incidence of this complication. Data sources searched included PubMed, MedLine and Scopus from January 1988 to June 2017. A total of 79 articles were used, ciprofloxacin representing the most common drug. We found that male gender, advanced age, normal BMI, chronic renal failure and concurrent use of corticosteroids increase the risk of Achilles tendon disorders.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 99 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 13%
Other 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Researcher 6 6%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 41 41%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 40 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2018.
All research outputs
#15,989,045
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Urology
#5,369
of 7,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,048
of 338,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Urology
#82
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,812 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.