↓ Skip to main content

Associations Between Heavy-Vehicle Driver Compensation Methods, Fatigue-Related Driving Behavior, and Sleepiness

Overview of attention for article published in Traffic Injury Prevention, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 1,193)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Associations Between Heavy-Vehicle Driver Compensation Methods, Fatigue-Related Driving Behavior, and Sleepiness
Published in
Traffic Injury Prevention, October 2014
DOI 10.1080/15389588.2014.928702
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

There has been growing recognition that broader economic and organizational factors play a role in creating work environments that facilitate high-risk driving behavior. This study investigates the association between compensation methods for drivers, fatigue-related driving behavior, and sleepiness among Australian heavy-vehicle drivers. Specifically, we hypothesized that piece-rate compensation methods linked to performance outcomes would be associated with greater levels of fatigue-related driving behaviors and sleepiness.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 101 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Student > Master 7 7%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 35 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 10%
Engineering 10 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 42 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2024.
All research outputs
#696,067
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Traffic Injury Prevention
#28
of 1,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,090
of 298,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Traffic Injury Prevention
#1
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,193 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.