You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Valuing Geospatial Information: Using the Contingent Valuation Method to Estimate the Economic Benefits of Landsat Satellite Imagery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.14358/pers.81.8.647 |
| Authors |
John Loomis, Steve Koontz, Holly Miller, Leslie Richardson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 13 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 4 | 12% |
| Engineering | 4 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 14 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2022.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing
#19
of 175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,015
of 276,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 175 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them