↓ Skip to main content

Synthetic cannabinoids

Overview of attention for article published in JAAPA: Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Synthetic cannabinoids
Published in
JAAPA: Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants, November 2017
DOI 10.1097/01.jaa.0000525914.28344.e2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shaina A. Freund, Adrian S. Banning

Abstract

Synthetic marijuana use is an emerging public health problem in the United States, and can cause agitation, severe psychosis, bizarre hallucinations, and possibly death. This article describes these products, which are unregulated and can vary widely in composition, and how clinicians can recognize patients with synthetic cannabinoid toxicity and treat them appropriately to minimize morbidity and mortality.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Researcher 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 27%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 15%
Psychology 3 12%
Chemistry 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 6 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2018.
All research outputs
#22,247,718
of 34,372,222 outputs
Outputs from JAAPA: Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants
#515
of 1,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,303
of 374,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAAPA: Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants
#16
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,372,222 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,494 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.