↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae B728a Regulates Multiple Stages of Plant Colonization via the Bacteriophytochrome BphP1
Published in
mBio, October 2017
DOI 10.1128/mbio.01178-17
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Light may be an important environmental signal for plant-associated bacteria, particularly those that live on leaves. An integrated network of red/far-red- and blue-light-responsive photosensory proteins is known to inhibit swarming motility in the foliar plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae B728a. Here we elucidated factors in the red/far-red-light-sensing bacteriophytochrome BphP1 signal transduction pathway and report evidence for a role of BphP1 in multiple stages of the Psyringae B728a life cycle. We report that BphP1 signaling involves the downstream regulator Bsi (bacteriophytochrome-regulated swarming inhibitor) and an acyl-homoserine lactone (AHL) signal. Loss of bphP1 or bsi resulted in the early initiation of swarm tendrils during swarming motility, a phenotype that was dependent on red/far-red light and reversed by exogenous AHL, illustrating that the BphP1-Bsi-AHL pathway inhibits the transition from a sessile state to a motile state. Loss of bphP1 or bsi resulted in larger water-soaked lesions induced on bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) pods and enhanced movement from soil and buried plant tissues to seeds, demonstrating that BphP1 and Bsi negatively regulate virulence and bacterial movement through soil to seeds. Moreover, BphP1, but not Bsi, contributed to leaf colonization; loss of bphP1 reduced survival on leaves immediately following inoculation but enhanced the size of the subsequently established populations. Neither Bsi nor Smp, a swarm motility-promoting regulator identified here, affected leaf colonization, indicating that BphP1-mediated contributions to leaf colonization are, at least in part, independent of swarming motility. These results demonstrate that Psyringae B728a red-light sensing involves a multicomponent, branched regulatory pathway that affects several stages of its life cycle.IMPORTANCE Microbes on plants are particularly well positioned to exploit light cues based on the importance of light to plant growth. Photosensory proteins enable organisms to sense light and respond to light, but their roles in the life cycles of plant microbes are poorly understood. This study investigated the cellular components and ecological roles of red/far-red-light sensing in the foliar bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae The study demonstrated that a bacteriophytochrome photosensory protein functions via a multicomponent, branched regulatory pathway that operates primarily through red/far-red-light-mediated inhibition. This pathway negatively regulates the transition from sessile to motile states under conditions conducive to swarming motility. It also negatively regulates virulence on bean pods, movement through soil to seeds, and survival following inoculation on leaves, but it positively contributes to the eventual establishment of leaf-borne populations. These results provide strong evidence that light sensing modulates behaviors at multiple stages in the life cycle of a nonphotosynthetic, plant microbe.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 20 43%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Chemistry 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 21 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2026.
All research outputs
#4,230,716
of 34,289,063 outputs
Outputs from mBio
#2,776
of 7,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,928
of 371,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from mBio
#69
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,289,063 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.