↓ Skip to main content

Financial strain, inflammatory factors, and haemoglobin A1c levels in African American women

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Health Psychology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
29 X users

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Financial strain, inflammatory factors, and haemoglobin A1c levels in African American women
Published in
British Journal of Health Psychology, October 2014
DOI 10.1111/bjhp.12120
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Type 2 diabetes disproportionately affects African American women, a population exposed to high levels of stress, including financial strain (Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, 2011, http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/pdf/ndfs_2011.pdf). We tested a mediational model in which chronic financial strain among African American women contributes to elevated serum inflammation markers, which, in turn, lead to increased haemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) levels and risk for type 2 diabetes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 64 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 18 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 15%
Psychology 6 9%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 22 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,487,028
of 34,170,764 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Health Psychology
#192
of 1,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,621
of 305,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Health Psychology
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,170,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,041 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.