↓ Skip to main content

Automated Analysis of Unregistered Multi-View Mammograms With Deep Learning

Overview of attention for article published in IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
4 patents

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Automated Analysis of Unregistered Multi-View Mammograms With Deep Learning
Published in
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, September 2017
DOI 10.1109/tmi.2017.2751523
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We describe an automated methodology for the analysis of unregistered cranio-caudal (CC) and medio-lateral oblique (MLO) mammography views in order to estimate the patient's risk of developing breast cancer. The main innovation behind this methodology lies in the use of deep learning models for the problem of jointly classifying unregistered mammogram views and respective segmentation maps of breast lesions (i.e., masses and micro-calcifications). This is a holistic methodology that can classify a whole mammographic exam, containing the CC and MLO views and the segmentation maps, as opposed to the classification of individual lesions, which is the dominant approach in the field. We also demonstrate that the proposed system is capable of using the segmentation maps generated by automated mass and micro-calcification detection systems, and still producing accurate results. The semi-automated approach (using manually defined mass and micro-calcification segmentation maps) is tested on two publicly available datasets (INbreast and DDSM), and results show that the volume under ROC surface (VUS) for a 3-class problem (normal tissue, benign and malignant) is over 0.9, the area under ROC curve (AUC) for the 2-class "benign vs malignant" problem is over 0.9, and for the 2- class breast screening problem (malignancy vs normal/benign) is also over 0.9. For the fully automated approach, the VUS results on INbreast is over 0.7, and the AUC for the 2-class "benign vs malignant" problem is over 0.78, and the AUC for the 2-class breast screening is 0.86.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 211 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 14%
Student > Master 29 14%
Researcher 23 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 4%
Other 33 16%
Unknown 76 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 64 30%
Engineering 27 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 9%
Mathematics 2 <1%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 <1%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 90 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2020.
All research outputs
#4,613,568
of 30,720,210 outputs
Outputs from IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
#567
of 4,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,105
of 337,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
#5
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,720,210 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.