↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Varying Case Definition on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Prevalence Estimates in a Pooled Cohort

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effects of Varying Case Definition on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Prevalence Estimates in a Pooled Cohort
Published in
Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, August 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.08.004
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To analyze differences Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) prevalence using a combination of electrodiagnostic study (EDS) and symptoms using EDS criteria varied across a range of cutpoints and compared to symptoms in both 1 or more and 2 or more median nerve served digits.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 81 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 14%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Other 6 7%
Other 19 23%
Unknown 20 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 16%
Engineering 5 6%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 24 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2016.
All research outputs
#9,527,999
of 34,526,284 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
#2,825
of 7,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,591
of 280,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
#35
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,526,284 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,922 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.