↓ Skip to main content

Premature Discharge from Methadone Treatment: Patient Perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Premature Discharge from Methadone Treatment: Patient Perspectives
Published in
Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, September 2009
DOI 10.1080/02791072.2009.10400539
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Longer retention in drug abuse treatment is associated with better patient outcomes, and research indicates the first 12 months of methadone treatment are critical to patient success. Nevertheless, large-scale multisite longitudinal studies over the past three decades indicate that the majority of patients drop out during the first year of methadone treatment. Through an examination of 42 qualitative interviews with patients prematurely discharged from six methadone treatment programs in Baltimore, this study highlights factors patients describe as contributing to their reasons for being discharged within the first 12 months of the treatment. The two most consistent themes are program-related factors and incarceration. The former factors are richly described through patients' words and underscore the ways in which patients' perceptions of control exerted by the program and by the medication and misunderstandings of program structure can lead to premature discharge. Patients' reasons for discharge were compared to counselors' reasons as indicated in discharge summary forms. An analysis of the patterns of agreement and disagreement are presented. Patient-centered program and policy implications are discussed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Puerto Rico 1 1%
Unknown 85 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 18%
Other 9 10%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 15 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 21%
Social Sciences 11 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 21 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,691,895
of 32,051,844 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Psychoactive Drugs
#155
of 1,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,772
of 133,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Psychoactive Drugs
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,051,844 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,207 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them