| Title |
Immediate lexical integration of novel word forms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cognition, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.09.007 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors | |
| Abstract |
It is well known that familiar words inhibit each other during spoken word recognition. However, we do not know how and under what circumstances newly learned words become integrated with the lexicon in order to engage in this competition. Previous work on word learning has highlighted the importance of offline consolidation (Gaskell & Dumay, 2003) and meaning (Leach & Samuel, 2007) to establish this integration. In two experiments we test the necessity of these factors by examining the inhibition between newly learned items and familiar words immediately after learning. Participants learned a set of nonwords without meanings in active (Experiment 1) or passive (Experiment 2) exposure paradigms. After training, participants performed a visual world paradigm task to assess inhibition from these newly learned items. An analysis of participants' fixations suggested that the newly learned words were able to engage in competition with known words without any consolidation. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Greece | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 141 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 23% |
| Researcher | 23 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 34 | 23% |
| Unknown | 16 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 75 | 50% |
| Linguistics | 21 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 30 | 20% |