↓ Skip to main content

Nanocomposites with Spatially Separated Functionalities for Combined Imaging and Magnetolytic Therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Chemical Society, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
11 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Nanocomposites with Spatially Separated Functionalities for Combined Imaging and Magnetolytic Therapy
Published in
Journal of the American Chemical Society, May 2010
DOI 10.1021/ja102489q
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Compact nanostructures with highly integrated functionalities are of considerable current interest to drug delivery, multimodality imaging, and electronic devices. A key challenge, however, is how to combine individual components together without interfering or sacrificing their original electronic and optical properties. Here, we demonstrate a new class of nanocomposites with spatially separated functionalities. We further demonstrate magnetic field modulated imaging and an innovative application of this technology in cancer cell treatment, magnetolytic therapy, based on magnetically controlled mechanical damage to cell membranes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Germany 3 2%
Poland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 176 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 34%
Student > Master 24 13%
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Professor 10 5%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 26 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 76 41%
Engineering 25 13%
Materials Science 23 12%
Physics and Astronomy 10 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 29 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2023.
All research outputs
#3,026,077
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#8,647
of 61,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,377
of 95,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#30
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 61,926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.