↓ Skip to main content

Medical Advances in the Treatment of Postpartum Hemorrhage

Overview of attention for article published in Anesthesia and analgesia, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Medical Advances in the Treatment of Postpartum Hemorrhage
Published in
Anesthesia and analgesia, November 2014
DOI 10.1213/ane.0000000000000450
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is a leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide. Recent advances in the management of severe bleeding for trauma patients may provide insight into PPH management, but must be applied with caution considering the significant differences between trauma and obstetric patients. In this review, we summarized evidence for current management strategies for patients with major obstetric hemorrhage, including (1) rapid laboratory assessment of coagulopathy, (2) early transfusion of plasma and high plasma-to-red blood cell transfusion ratios in massive PPH, and (3) use of tranexamic acid and fibrinogen concentrates in the setting of PPH complicated by coagulopathy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 146 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 21 14%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Student > Postgraduate 12 8%
Other 36 24%
Unknown 33 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 92 61%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Engineering 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 36 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2026.
All research outputs
#4,588,172
of 34,360,889 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesia and analgesia
#1,525
of 10,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,668
of 305,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesia and analgesia
#9
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.