↓ Skip to main content

還元化した下水系土壌での生態系の再生

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. B3 (Ocean Engineering), January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
還元化した下水系土壌での生態系の再生
Published in
Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. B3 (Ocean Engineering), January 2015
DOI 10.2208/jscejoe.71.i_910
Authors

日比野 忠史, 金城 信隆, TOUCH NARONG, 福岡 捷二

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2017.
All research outputs
#17,289,387
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. B3 (Ocean Engineering)
#27
of 43 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,199
of 359,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. B3 (Ocean Engineering)
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one scored the same or higher as 16 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.