↓ Skip to main content

Form of an evolutionary tradeoff affects eco-evolutionary dynamics in a predator–prey system

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users

Readers on

mendeley
228 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Form of an evolutionary tradeoff affects eco-evolutionary dynamics in a predator–prey system
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2014
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1406357111
Pubmed ID
Authors

Minoru Kasada, Masato Yamamichi, Takehito Yoshida

Abstract

Evolution on a time scale similar to ecological dynamics has been increasingly recognized for the last three decades. Selection mediated by ecological interactions can change heritable phenotypic variation (i.e., evolution), and evolution of traits, in turn, can affect ecological interactions. Hence, ecological and evolutionary dynamics can be tightly linked and important to predict future dynamics, but our understanding of eco-evolutionary dynamics is still in its infancy and there is a significant gap between theoretical predictions and empirical tests. Empirical studies have demonstrated that the presence of genetic variation can dramatically change ecological dynamics, whereas theoretical studies predict that eco-evolutionary dynamics depend on the details of the genetic variation, such as the form of a tradeoff among genotypes, which can be more important than the presence or absence of the genetic variation. Using a predator-prey (rotifer-algal) experimental system in laboratory microcosms, we studied how different forms of a tradeoff between prey defense and growth affect eco-evolutionary dynamics. Our experimental results show for the first time to our knowledge that different forms of the tradeoff produce remarkably divergent eco-evolutionary dynamics, including near fixation, near extinction, and coexistence of algal genotypes, with quantitatively different population dynamics. A mathematical model, parameterized from completely independent experiments, explains the observed dynamics. The results suggest that knowing the details of heritable trait variation and covariation within a population is essential for understanding how evolution and ecology will interact and what form of eco-evolutionary dynamics will result.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 1%
United States 3 1%
Japan 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 209 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 25%
Researcher 57 25%
Student > Master 25 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 6%
Other 34 15%
Unknown 24 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 121 53%
Environmental Science 46 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 5%
Physics and Astronomy 7 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 2%
Other 10 4%
Unknown 27 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2015.
All research outputs
#3,118,729
of 24,625,114 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#33,660
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,962
of 265,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#479
of 966 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,625,114 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 966 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.