↓ Skip to main content

Controlling Porosity in Lignin‐Derived Nanoporous Carbon for Supercapacitor Applications

Overview of attention for article published in ChemSusChem, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Controlling Porosity in Lignin‐Derived Nanoporous Carbon for Supercapacitor Applications
Published in
ChemSusChem, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/cssc.201402621
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Low-cost renewable lignin has been used as a precursor to produce porous carbons. However, to date, it has not been easy to obtain high surface area porous carbon without activation processes or templating agents. Here, we demonstrate that low molecular weight lignin yields highly porous carbon with more graphitization through direct carbonization without additional activation processes or templating agents. We found that molecular weight and oxygen consumption during carbonization are critical factors to obtain high surface area, graphitized porous carbons. This highly porous carbon from low-cost renewable lignin sources is a good candidate for supercapacitor electrode materials.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 156 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 19%
Researcher 29 18%
Student > Master 19 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 4%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 46 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 29 18%
Chemistry 28 18%
Chemical Engineering 12 8%
Engineering 10 6%
Energy 5 3%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 63 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2024.
All research outputs
#9,977,790
of 31,439,095 outputs
Outputs from ChemSusChem
#1,580
of 7,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,463
of 291,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ChemSusChem
#38
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,439,095 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,012 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.