↓ Skip to main content

Getting Closer to an Effective Intervention of Ischemic Stroke: The Big Promise of Stem Cell

Overview of attention for article published in Translational Stroke Research, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Getting Closer to an Effective Intervention of Ischemic Stroke: The Big Promise of Stem Cell
Published in
Translational Stroke Research, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12975-017-0580-0
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Stem cell therapy for ischemic stroke has widely been explored. Results from both preclinical and clinical studies have immensely supported the judicious use of stem cells as therapy. These provide an attractive means for preserving and replacing the damaged brain tissues following an ischemic attack. Since the past few years, researchers have used various types of stem cells to replenish insulted neuronal and glial cells in neurological disorders. In the present review, we discuss different types of stem cells employed for the treatment of ischemic stroke and mechanisms and challenges these cells face once introduced into the living system. Further, we also present different ways to maneuver and overcome challenges to translate the advances made at the preclinical level to clinics.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 20 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 12 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 24 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2017.
All research outputs
#20,450,513
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Translational Stroke Research
#359
of 444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285,705
of 327,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Translational Stroke Research
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 444 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.