You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Activity
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Delayed versus Immediate Cord Clamping in Preterm Infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa1711281 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan Morris, Adrienne Kirby, Rebecca Brown, Nicholas Evans, Michael Fogarty, Michelle Jeffery, Anthony Keech, Michael Belfort, Graham Reynolds, Yan Chen, Philip Weston, Harshad Patel, Scott Morris, Leslie Young, David Sweet, Andrew Watkins, David Osborn, William Tarnow-Mordi, Lisa Askie, Sarah Finlayson, Alpana Ghadge, Wendy Hague, Lucille Sebastian, Kjersti Aagaard, Paul Colditz, Margo Pritchard, Peta Forder, Walid El-Naggar, Katie Groom, Joanna Gullam, Guan Koh, Arvind Sehgal, Kristy Robledo, Val Gebski, David Isaacs, Martin Kluckow, Himanshu Popat, Mohan Pammi, Mohamed Abdel-Latif, Shabina Ariff, Lumaan Sheikh, Helen Liley, Daniele de Luca, Koert de Waal, Lelia Duley, Andrew Gill, John Newnham, Karen Simmer, Kei Lui, Neil Marlow, Euan Wallace, Roger Soll, Susan Walker, Ian Wright, John Simes |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 299 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 57 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 25 | 8% |
| Spain | 24 | 8% |
| Mexico | 23 | 8% |
| Australia | 18 | 6% |
| Canada | 6 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 5 | 2% |
| Colombia | 4 | 1% |
| Argentina | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 33 | 11% |
| Unknown | 101 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 199 | 67% |
| Scientists | 53 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 40 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 2% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 388 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 388 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 41 | 11% |
| Other | 36 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 28 | 7% |
| Other | 81 | 21% |
| Unknown | 140 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 165 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 1% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 3% |
| Unknown | 162 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 519. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2026.
All research outputs
#61,993
of 34,547,233 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#1,918
of 38,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,044
of 374,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#42
of 267 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,547,233 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38,551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 120.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 267 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.