↓ Skip to main content

Septic Arthritis and Prosthetic Joint Infections in Older Adults

Overview of attention for article published in Infectious disease clinics of North America, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Septic Arthritis and Prosthetic Joint Infections in Older Adults
Published in
Infectious disease clinics of North America, December 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.idc.2017.07.013
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Older adults are at increased risk for septic arthritis and prosthetic joint infections (PJI), owing at least in part to comorbid conditions and frailty. An increasing number of older adults undergo total joint arthroplasty to improve their quality of life. Infections in older adults differ from younger populations by the causative organisms, a great proportion of which are Staphylococcal infections. Targeting important modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors may prevent or reduce the burden of joint infections in older adults. This review summarizes the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, management, and prevention of septic arthritis and PJI in older adults.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 185 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Other 22 12%
Researcher 22 12%
Student > Postgraduate 17 9%
Student > Master 15 8%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 60 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 67 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2021.
All research outputs
#11,929,160
of 34,457,357 outputs
Outputs from Infectious disease clinics of North America
#677
of 1,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,767
of 491,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infectious disease clinics of North America
#13
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,457,357 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 64th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 491,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.