↓ Skip to main content

Disinfection Byproducts and Bladder Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiology, May 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Disinfection Byproducts and Bladder Cancer
Published in
Epidemiology, May 2004
DOI 10.1097/01.ede.0000121380.02594.fc
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Exposure to disinfection byproducts in drinking water has been associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer. We pooled the primary data from 6 case-control studies of bladder cancer that used trihalomethanes as a marker of disinfection byproducts.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 3 1%
Canada 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 197 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 16%
Researcher 31 15%
Student > Master 28 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 5%
Other 39 19%
Unknown 53 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 38 18%
Chemistry 27 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 11%
Engineering 21 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 7%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 61 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,351,812
of 33,059,767 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiology
#810
of 3,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,278
of 83,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiology
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,059,767 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.