↓ Skip to main content

Non-emphysematous chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is associated with diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
14 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Non-emphysematous chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is associated with diabetes mellitus
Published in
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2466-14-164
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been classically divided into blue bloaters and pink puffers. The utility of these clinical subtypes is unclear. However, the broader distinction between airway-predominant and emphysema-predominant COPD may be clinically relevant. Objectives: To define clinical features of emphysema-predominant and non-emphysematous COPD patients.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 113 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 17%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Other 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 40 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 44 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2014.
All research outputs
#2,124,681
of 26,855,601 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#102
of 2,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,897
of 275,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#2
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,855,601 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,006 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.