↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of injured patient and general population valuations of EQ-5D health states for New Zealand

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A comparison of injured patient and general population valuations of EQ-5D health states for New Zealand
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-12-21
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A near-universal finding internationally is that patient valuations of their own health, represented using the EQ-5D system, are mostly higher than general population valuations of the same EQ-5D states. This paper investigates whether this result also applies to New Zealand. Despite the EQ-5D's widespread use for cost-utility analysis in New Zealand, in particular by the Pharmaceutical Management Agency (PHARMAC) for health technology assessments, no previous studies comparing patient and general population valuations have included data for New Zealand.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Sweden 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 39 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Other 9 22%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 32%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 8 20%