↓ Skip to main content

Psychosocial Syndemics are Additively Associated with Worse ART Adherence in HIV-Infected Individuals

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Psychosocial Syndemics are Additively Associated with Worse ART Adherence in HIV-Infected Individuals
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10461-014-0925-6
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) among HIV-infected individuals is necessary to both individual and public health, and psychosocial problems have independently been associated with poor adherence. To date, studies have not systematically examined the effect of multiple, co-occurring psychosocial problems (i.e., "syndemics") on ART adherence. Participants included 333 HIV-infected individuals who completed a comprehensive baseline evaluation, as part of a clinical trial to evaluate an intervention to treat depression and optimize medication adherence. Participants completed self-report questionnaires, and trained clinicians completed semi-structured diagnostic interviews. ART non-adherence was objectively measured via an electronic pill cap (i.e., MEMS). As individuals reported a greater number of syndemic indicators, their odds of non-adherence increased. Co-occurring psychosocial problems have an additive effect on the risk for poor ART adherence. Future behavioral medicine interventions are needed that address these problems comprehensively, and/or the core mechanisms that they share.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Unknown 138 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 20%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 25 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 22%
Psychology 20 14%
Social Sciences 19 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 34 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2025.
All research outputs
#4,890,205
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#702
of 3,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,786
of 303,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#10
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.