↓ Skip to main content

ALK and IGF-1R as independent targets in crizotinib resistant lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
ALK and IGF-1R as independent targets in crizotinib resistant lung cancer
Published in
Scientific Reports, October 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-14289-w
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

ALK positive non-small cell lung cancer is highly responsive to ALK inhibitors such as crizotinib, but drug resistance typically develops within a year of treatment. In this study we investigated whether IGF-1R is an independent druggable target in ALK-positive lung cancer cells. We confirmed that combination ALK and IGF-1R inhibitor treatment is synergistically cytotoxic to ALK-positive lung cancer cells and that this remains the case for at least 12 days after initial exposure to crizotinib. ALK-positive cells with acquired resistance to crizotinib did not acquire cross-resistance to IGF-1R inhibition, though combination treatment in the resistant cells gave additive rather than synergistic cytotoxicity. We concluded that IGF-1R is an independent druggable target in ALK-positive lung cancer and support the trial of combination treatment.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 21%
Other 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 6 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2017.
All research outputs
#20,451,228
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#106,238
of 124,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285,602
of 327,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#3,794
of 4,660 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124,255 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,660 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.