↓ Skip to main content

Arsenic Mobility during Flooding of Contaminated Soil: The Effect of Microbial Sulfate Reduction

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Technology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Arsenic Mobility during Flooding of Contaminated Soil: The Effect of Microbial Sulfate Reduction
Published in
Environmental Science & Technology, November 2014
DOI 10.1021/es503963k
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In floodplain soils, As may be released during flooding-induced soil anoxia, with the degree of mobilization being affected by microbial redox processes, such as the reduction of As(V), Fe(III) and SO42-. Microbial SO42- reduction may affect both Fe and As cycling, but the processes involved and their ultimate consequences on As mobility are not well understood. Here, we examine the effect of microbial SO42 reduction on solution dynamics and solid-phase speciation of As during flooding of an As-contaminated soil. In the absence of significant levels of microbial SO42- reduction, flooding caused increased Fe(II) and As(III) concentrations over a 10 week period, consistent with microbial Fe(III)- and As(V)-reduction. Microbial SO42- reduction lead to lower concentrations of porewater Fe(II), as a result of FeS formation. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (EDX) revealed that the newly formed FeS sequestered substantial amounts of As. Bulk and micro-focused As K-edge XANES spectroscopy confirmed that As(V) was reduced to As(III) and showed that, in the presence of FeS, solid-phase As was retained partly via the formation of an As2S3-like species. High resolution transmission electron microscopy suggested that this was due to As retention as an As2S3-like complex associated with mackinawite (tetragonal FeS), rather than as a discrete As2S3 phase. This study shows that mackinawite formation in contaminated floodplain soil can help mitigate the extent of arsenic mobilization during prolonged flooding.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 137 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 24%
Student > Master 19 14%
Researcher 13 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Professor 7 5%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 36 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 49 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 6%
Engineering 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 44 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2014.
All research outputs
#18,871,553
of 27,369,606 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#18,113
of 22,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,805
of 273,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#201
of 276 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,369,606 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 276 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.