↓ Skip to main content

What Are the Functional Results and Complications From Allograft Reconstruction After Partial Hemipelvectomy of the Pubis?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
What Are the Functional Results and Complications From Allograft Reconstruction After Partial Hemipelvectomy of the Pubis?
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11999-014-4009-8
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In patients undergoing hemipelvectomies including resection either of a portion of the pubis or the entire pubis from the symphysis to the lateral margin of the obturator foramen while sparing the hip (so-called Dunham Type III hemipelvectomies), reconstructions typically are not performed given the preserved continuity of the weightbearing axis and the potential complications associated with reconstruction. Allograft reconstruction of the pelvic ring may, however, offer benefits for soft tissue reconstruction of the pelvic floor and hip stability, but little is known about these reconstructions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 16%
Other 5 8%
Researcher 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 28 44%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 28 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2014.
All research outputs
#28,179,885
of 33,931,414 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#7,684
of 9,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,524
of 305,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#100
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,931,414 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.