↓ Skip to main content

Is There Material Loss at the Backside Taper in Modular CoCr Acetabular Liners?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Is There Material Loss at the Backside Taper in Modular CoCr Acetabular Liners?
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11999-014-3982-2
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Metal wear and corrosion products generated by hip replacements have been linked to adverse local tissue reactions. Recent investigations of the stem/head taper junction have identified this modular interface as another possible source of metal debris; however, little is known regarding other modular metallic interfaces, their ability to produce metal debris, and possibly to provide insight in the mechanisms that produce metal debris.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Master 6 13%
Other 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 15 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 28%
Engineering 10 21%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 19 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2014.
All research outputs
#24,782,047
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#6,878
of 9,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,466
of 300,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#90
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.