↓ Skip to main content

Guidelines for cross‐cultural Participatory Action Research partnerships: A case study of a customary seabird harvest in New Zealand

Overview of attention for article published in New Zealand Journal of Zoology, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Guidelines for cross‐cultural Participatory Action Research partnerships: A case study of a customary seabird harvest in New Zealand
Published in
New Zealand Journal of Zoology, February 2010
DOI 10.1080/03014220909510152
Authors

Henrik Moller, Philip O'Blyver, Corey Bragg, Jamie Newman, Rosemary Clucas, David Fletcher, Jane Kitson, Sam McKechnie, Darren Scott, Rakiura Titi Islands Administering Body

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 182 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 20%
Researcher 32 17%
Student > Master 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Other 38 20%
Unknown 35 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 49 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 19%
Social Sciences 32 17%
Arts and Humanities 6 3%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 43 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#6,943,549
of 31,895,487 outputs
Outputs from New Zealand Journal of Zoology
#115
of 721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,218
of 131,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New Zealand Journal of Zoology
#38
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,895,487 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.