↓ Skip to main content

Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of eating disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
784 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of eating disorders
Published in
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, October 2014
DOI 10.1177/0004867414555814
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This clinical practice guideline for treatment of DSM-5 feeding and eating disorders was conducted as part of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) Project 2013-2014.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 784 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 780 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 119 15%
Student > Bachelor 102 13%
Researcher 67 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 7%
Other 51 7%
Other 131 17%
Unknown 259 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 167 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 158 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 55 7%
Social Sciences 21 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 3%
Other 68 9%
Unknown 295 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2025.
All research outputs
#718,446
of 34,444,361 outputs
Outputs from Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
#95
of 2,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,350
of 306,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
#2
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,444,361 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.