↓ Skip to main content

Nusinersen versus Sham Control in Infantile-Onset Spinal Muscular Atrophy

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
1781 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 125 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,781 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 1781 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 215 12%
Student > Bachelor 172 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 157 9%
Student > Master 141 8%
Other 134 8%
Other 265 15%
Unknown 697 39%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 355 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 218 12%
Neuroscience 131 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 82 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 77 4%
Other 169 9%
Unknown 749 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 407. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2026.
All research outputs
#92,646
of 34,413,214 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#2,467
of 38,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,615
of 374,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#55
of 270 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,413,214 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38,395 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 120.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 270 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.