↓ Skip to main content

Novel loci affecting iron homeostasis and their effects in individuals at risk for hemochromatosis

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Novel loci affecting iron homeostasis and their effects in individuals at risk for hemochromatosis
Published in
Nature Communications, October 2014
DOI 10.1038/ncomms5926
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Variation in body iron is associated with or causes diseases, including anaemia and iron overload. Here, we analyse genetic association data on biochemical markers of iron status from 11 European-population studies, with replication in eight additional cohorts (total up to 48,972 subjects). We find 11 genome-wide-significant (P<5 × 10(-8)) loci, some including known iron-related genes (HFE, SLC40A1, TF, TFR2, TFRC, TMPRSS6) and others novel (ABO, ARNTL, FADS2, NAT2, TEX14). SNPs at ARNTL, TF, and TFR2 affect iron markers in HFE C282Y homozygotes at risk for hemochromatosis. There is substantial overlap between our iron loci and loci affecting erythrocyte and lipid phenotypes. These results will facilitate investigation of the roles of iron in disease.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 204 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 43 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 15%
Student > Master 18 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 5%
Other 9 4%
Other 35 17%
Unknown 60 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 12%
Computer Science 6 3%
Chemistry 6 3%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 70 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2015.
All research outputs
#8,026,134
of 25,547,904 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#43,743
of 57,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,550
of 274,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#508
of 745 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,547,904 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57,591 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 745 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.