↓ Skip to main content

Dietary manipulation in musculoskeletal conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Dietary manipulation in musculoskeletal conditions
Published in
Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology, June 2008
DOI 10.1016/j.berh.2007.12.010
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Dietary advice and intervention clearly have a place in rheumatology and allow patients to have some control over their own disease. Although there is no evidence for efficacy of 'fad' diets, 30-40% of rheumatoid patients can benefit from excluding foods individually identified during the reintroduction phase of an elimination diet. A proportion of patients who follow a vegetarian or Mediterranean-type diet will experience benefit. Patients who are either overweight or obese should participate in weight-loss programmes. Those with osteoarthritis need to concentrate on reducing fat mass while maintaining muscle mass. Arthritic patients, other than those with gout, should increase their intake of oily fish and additionally supplement with fish oil for up to 3 months to see whether they experience benefit. All arthritic patients, particularly those with inflammatory disease, should be advised to ensure a good dietary intake of antioxidants, copper and zinc. Supplementation with selenium and vitamin D may be advisable.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 152 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 35 22%
Student > Master 20 13%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Postgraduate 12 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 36 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 12%
Sports and Recreations 4 3%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 43 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2018.
All research outputs
#26,582,483
of 32,041,085 outputs
Outputs from Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology
#883
of 983 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,413
of 128,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,041,085 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 983 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.