↓ Skip to main content

Plasticity of the aging brain: New directions in cognitive neuroscience

Overview of attention for article published in Science, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
30 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
3 Redditors
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
557 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Plasticity of the aging brain: New directions in cognitive neuroscience
Published in
Science, October 2014
DOI 10.1126/science.1254604
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Cognitive neuroscience has revealed aging of the human brain to be rich in reorganization and change. Neuroimaging results have recast our framework around cognitive aging from one of decline to one emphasizing plasticity. Current methods use neurostimulation approaches to manipulate brain function, providing a direct test of the ways that the brain differently contributes to task performance for younger and older adults. Emerging research into emotional, social, and motivational domains provides some evidence for preservation with age, suggesting potential avenues of plasticity, alongside additional evidence for reorganization. Thus, we begin to see that aging of the brain, amidst interrelated behavioral and biological changes, is as complex and idiosyncratic as the brain itself, qualitatively changing over the life span.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 557 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 10 2%
Germany 5 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Hungary 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 8 1%
Unknown 523 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 103 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 101 18%
Student > Bachelor 77 14%
Student > Master 63 11%
Professor 29 5%
Other 113 20%
Unknown 71 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 146 26%
Neuroscience 90 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 53 10%
Engineering 33 6%
Other 69 12%
Unknown 112 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2025.
All research outputs
#750,586
of 32,465,735 outputs
Outputs from Science
#15,616
of 92,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,786
of 296,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#190
of 849 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,465,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 92,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 849 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.