↓ Skip to main content

Injury Risk to Extraosseous Knee Vasculature During Osteotomies: A Cadaveric Study With CT and Dissection Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Injury Risk to Extraosseous Knee Vasculature During Osteotomies: A Cadaveric Study With CT and Dissection Analysis
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11999-014-4007-x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Realignment osteotomies about the knee may be performed as distal femoral or proximal tibial osteotomies; both may be performed either on the medial or lateral sides of the knee, in closing- or opening-wedge fashion. Although rare, injury to neurovascular structures may occur, and the proximity of the vascular structures to the osteotomy saw cuts has been incompletely characterized.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 59 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 24 39%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Engineering 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Unknown 30 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2015.
All research outputs
#23,234,128
of 34,359,530 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#6,373
of 9,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,292
of 307,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#67
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,359,530 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.