↓ Skip to main content

Lymphomatoid granulomatosis presenting with cutaneous involvement: a case report and review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cutaneous Pathology, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Lymphomatoid granulomatosis presenting with cutaneous involvement: a case report and review of the literature
Published in
Journal of Cutaneous Pathology, December 2014
DOI 10.1111/cup.12402
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Lymphomatoid granulomatosis (LG) is a rare Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder presenting in middle adulthood that nearly always affects the lungs and shows cutaneous involvement in up to 50% of cases. Skin lesions are present at the time of diagnosis in roughly one-third of patients and may precede the development of lung lesions in as many as 10-15%. Recognition by both the dermatologist and dermatopathologist is therefore crucial for early and accurate diagnosis. While skin involvement is grossly and microscopically diverse, the disease most commonly presents as erythematous subcutaneous and dermal nodules showing the classic histopathologic triad of transmural lymphocytic angiitis, atypical B-lymphocytes in a polymorphous T-cell background, and necrotic foci within lymphoid aggregates. We present a case of lymphomatoid granulomatosis initially presenting with cutaneous lesions, with an accompanying review of the literature.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 17%
Student > Postgraduate 2 17%
Other 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 3 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 67%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Psychology 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2015.
All research outputs
#17,730,142
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cutaneous Pathology
#988
of 1,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,312
of 360,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cutaneous Pathology
#19
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,397 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.