Ly6C(hi) inflammatory monocytes (iMO) are critical for host defense against toxoplasmosis and malaria but their role in leishmaniasis is unclear. In this study, we report a detrimental role of Ly6C(hi) iMOs in visceral leishmaniasis (VL) caused by Leishmania donovani. We demonstrate that Ly6C(hi) iMOs are continuously recruited into the spleen and liver during L. donovani infection and they are preferential targets for the parasite. Using microarray-based gene expression profiling, we show that Ly6C(hi) iMOs isolated from the infected liver and spleen have distinct phenotypic and activation profiles. Furthermore, we demonstrate that blocking the recruitment of Ly6C(hi) iMOs into the liver and spleen during L. donovani infection using a CCR2 antagonist reduces the frequency of the pathogenic IFN-γ/IL10 dual producer CD4+ T cells in the spleen and leads to a significant reduction in parasite loads in the liver and spleen. Using STAT1-/- mice we show that STAT1 is critical for mediating the recruitment of Ly6C(hi) iMOs into organs during L. donovani infection, and adaptive transfer of wild type Ly6C(hi) iMOs into STAT1-/- recipients renders them susceptible to disease. Our findings reveal an unexpected pathogenic role for Ly6C(hi) iMOs in promoting parasite survival in VL and open the possibility of targeting this population for host-directed therapy during VL.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2017.
All research outputs
#14,084,031
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#65,097
of 124,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,914
of 328,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#2,127
of 4,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124,255 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
