You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Environmental and ecological conditions at Arctic breeding sites have limited effects on true survival rates of adult shorebirds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ornithology, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1642/auk-17-107.1 |
| Authors |
Emily L. Weiser, Richard B. Lanctot, Stephen C. Brown, H. River Gates, Rebecca L. Bentzen, Joël Bêty, Megan L. Boldenow, Willow B. English, Samantha E. Franks, Laura Koloski, Eunbi Kwon, Jean-François Lamarre, David B. Lank, Joseph R. Liebezeit, Laura McKinnon, Erica Nol, Jennie Rausch, Sarah T. Saalfeld, Nathan R. Senner, David H. Ward, Paul F. Woodard, Brett K. Sandercock |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 87 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 13% |
| Canada | 5 | 6% |
| Australia | 4 | 5% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 36 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 64 | 74% |
| Scientists | 16 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 127 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 19% |
| Researcher | 23 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 23 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 70 | 55% |
| Environmental Science | 26 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 24 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2020.
All research outputs
#545,015
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Ornithology
#41
of 2,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,668
of 340,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ornithology
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.