↓ Skip to main content

Skin and Soft Tissue Infection Management, Outcomes, and Follow-Up in the Emergency Department of an Urban Academic Hospital

Overview of attention for article published in Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Skin and Soft Tissue Infection Management, Outcomes, and Follow-Up in the Emergency Department of an Urban Academic Hospital
Published in
Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal, October 2014
DOI 10.1097/tme.0000000000000039
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are among the most common infections treated by emergency department clinicians. The emergence of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) as the cause of these infections prompted the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Infectious Disease Society of America to publish guidelines for the outpatient management of SSTIs. This study describes the management and outcomes of emergency department patients treated for uncomplicated SSTIs who returned within 30 days of the initial visit. The study found that of 857 eligible patients, only 17.6% returned and of these, 80% had their wound checked or packing removed. The clinicians prescribed antibiotics for the majority of patients, and the selection of antibiotics typically was active against CA-MRSA. Of 91 lesions drained, 24 specimens were obtained for culture and sensitivity. The majority of the initial treatment of patients consisted of incision and drainage with antibiotic prescription.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Peru 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 9 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 14%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Philosophy 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 17 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2014.
All research outputs
#17,498,272
of 27,265,592 outputs
Outputs from Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal
#99
of 384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,603
of 267,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,265,592 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 384 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.