↓ Skip to main content

Using Particle Lithography to Tailor the Architecture of Au Nanoparticle Plasmonic Nanoring Arrays

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physical Chemistry B, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Using Particle Lithography to Tailor the Architecture of Au Nanoparticle Plasmonic Nanoring Arrays
Published in
Journal of Physical Chemistry B, September 2017
DOI 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b06357
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The facile assembly of metal nanostructured arrays is a fundamental step in the design of plasmon enhanced chemical sensing and solar cell architectures. Here we have investigated methods of creating controlled formations of two-dimensional periodic arrays comprised of 20 nm Au nanoparticles (NPs) on a hydrophilic polymer surface using particle lithography. To direct the assembly process, capillary force and NP concentration both play critical roles on the resulting nanostructured arrays. As such, tuning these experimental parameters can directly be used to modify the nature of the nanostructures formed. To explore this, two different concentrations of Au NP solutions (~7 x 10(11) NPs/mL or 4 x 10(12) NPs/mL) were used in conjunction with a fixed concentration of polystyrene microspheres (PS MS, ~ 6 x 10(9) PS MS/mL). Assembly at a relative humidity (RH) of 45% with the higher concentration resulted in the formation of well-defined Au nanorings of ca. 23 nm in height and 881 nm in diameter with a pitch of 2.5 μm. Assembly at 65% RH with the lower concentration of NPs resulted in Au nanodonut arrays comprised of isolated single Au NPs. To explore the extent of coupling in the well-defined structures, dark field scattering spectra were collected and showed a broad localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) peak with a shoulder, which full-wave electrodynamics modeling (Finite-Difference Time Domain (FDTD) method) attributed to be a result of pronounced particle-particle coupling along the circumference of the nanoring array.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 41%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Professor 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 7 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 13 41%
Engineering 4 13%
Chemical Engineering 2 6%
Physics and Astronomy 2 6%
Materials Science 2 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2017.
All research outputs
#28,611,663
of 34,372,222 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physical Chemistry B
#13,503
of 17,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285,677
of 355,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physical Chemistry B
#146
of 298 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,372,222 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,744 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 298 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.