↓ Skip to main content

The 3D Elevation Program national indexing scheme

Overview of attention for article published in US Geological Survey, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The 3D Elevation Program national indexing scheme
Published in
US Geological Survey, January 2017
DOI 10.3133/fs20173073
Authors

Thatcher, Cindy A., Heidemann, Hans Karl, Stoker, Jason M., Eldridge, Diane F., Cindy A. Thatcher, Hans Karl Heidemann, Jason M. Stoker, Diane F. Eldridge

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2017.
All research outputs
#4,205,386
of 25,183,822 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#266
of 2,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,350
of 432,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#60
of 394 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,183,822 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 394 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.