↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of Antibodies to Rickettsiae in Different Regions of Serbia

Overview of attention for article published in Vector Borne & Zoonotic Diseases, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence of Antibodies to Rickettsiae in Different Regions of Serbia
Published in
Vector Borne & Zoonotic Diseases, April 2008
DOI 10.1089/vbz.2007.0122
Pubmed ID
Authors

Svetomir Samardzic, Tatjana Marinkovic, Dragan Marinkovic, Bosiljka Djuricic, Elizabeta Ristanovic, Tatjana Simovic, Branislav Lako, Biljana Vukov, Bojana Bozovic, Ana Gligic

Abstract

We assayed the presence of antibodies specific for Rickettsia typhi, R. akari, and R. conorii in sera of persons from several localities in Serbia with different geographic, climatic, and lifestyle characteristics. Sera from 140 patients with unclear clinical symptoms and 273 healthy persons were tested for the presence of rickettsiae-specific antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence assay. In this study, for the first time we detected the presence of rickettsiae from the spotted fever group in Serbia. We detected the presence of antibodies against R. conorii in the samples from all tested localities. The proportion of positive cases was low in the plain agricultural areas but reached up to 23% in the mountain areas. We also observed a significant number of cases positive for antibodies against R. akari. Antibodies specific for the antigens of R. typhi were detected in only 2 samples from the municipality of Pec (Kosovo region). These findings contribute to the prevalence of Rickettsia species in Southeast Europe. Our study also revealed a dramatic lack of awareness of rickettsioses among medical personnel and pointed to the need for urgent measures that would help improve the current situation in the region.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Serbia 1 13%
Unknown 7 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 25%
Researcher 2 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 13%
Social Sciences 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2012.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Vector Borne & Zoonotic Diseases
#443
of 1,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,583
of 95,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vector Borne & Zoonotic Diseases
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,535 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.