↓ Skip to main content

Prediction of Postoperative Mechanical Ventilation After Thymectomy in Patients With Myasthenia Gravis: A Myth or Reality

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Prediction of Postoperative Mechanical Ventilation After Thymectomy in Patients With Myasthenia Gravis: A Myth or Reality
Published in
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, August 2017
DOI 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.08.014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 22%
Professor 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Student > Postgraduate 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 11%
Neuroscience 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2017.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
#2,237
of 3,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,221
of 327,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
#35
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.