↓ Skip to main content

Family planning: the unfinished agenda

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
17 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
1660 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Family planning: the unfinished agenda
Published in
The Lancet, November 2006
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69480-4
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Promotion of family planning in countries with high birth rates has the potential to reduce poverty and hunger and avert 32% of all maternal deaths and nearly 10% of childhood deaths. It would also contribute substantially to women's empowerment, achievement of universal primary schooling, and long-term environmental sustainability. In the past 40 years, family-planning programmes have played a major part in raising the prevalence of contraceptive practice from less than 10% to 60% and reducing fertility in developing countries from six to about three births per woman. However, in half the 75 larger low-income and lower-middle income countries (mainly in Africa), contraceptive practice remains low and fertility, population growth, and unmet need for family planning are high. The cross-cutting contribution to the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals makes greater investment in family planning in these countries compelling. Despite the size of this unfinished agenda, international funding and promotion of family planning has waned in the past decade. A revitalisation of the agenda is urgently needed. Historically, the USA has taken the lead but other governments or agencies are now needed as champions. Based on the sizeable experience of past decades, the key features of effective programmes are clearly established. Most governments of poor countries already have appropriate population and family-planning policies but are receiving too little international encouragement and funding to implement them with vigour. What is currently missing is political willingness to incorporate family planning into the development arena.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,660 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 7 <1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Botswana 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 8 <1%
Unknown 1629 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 379 23%
Student > Bachelor 158 10%
Researcher 142 9%
Student > Postgraduate 134 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 130 8%
Other 235 14%
Unknown 482 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 377 23%
Social Sciences 258 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 173 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 65 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 50 3%
Other 216 13%
Unknown 521 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 106. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2026.
All research outputs
#498,328
of 34,151,039 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#4,543
of 51,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#765
of 127,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#14
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,151,039 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 51,748 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.