↓ Skip to main content

When can efforts to control nuisance and invasive species backfire?

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Applications, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
When can efforts to control nuisance and invasive species backfire?
Published in
Ecological Applications, September 2009
DOI 10.1890/08-1467.1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elise F. Zipkin, Clifford E. Kraft, Evan G. Cooch, Patrick J. Sullivan

Abstract

Population control through harvest has the potential to reduce the abundance of nuisance and invasive species. However, demographic structure and density-dependent processes can confound removal efforts and lead to undesirable consequences, such as overcompensation (an increase in abundance in response to harvest) and instability (population cycling or chaos). Recent empirical studies have demonstrated the potential for increased mortality (such as that caused by harvest) to lead to overcompensation and instability in plant, insect, and fish populations. We developed a general population model with juvenile and adult stages to help determine the conditions under which control harvest efforts can produce unintended outcomes. Analytical and simulation analyses of the model demonstrated that the potential for overcompensation as a result of harvest was significant for species with high fecundity, even when annual stage-specific survivorship values were fairly low. Population instability as a result of harvest occurred less frequently and was only possible with harvest strategies that targeted adults when both fecundity and adult survivorship were high. We considered these results in conjunction with current literature on nuisance and invasive species to propose general guidelines for assessing the risks associated with control harvest based on life history characteristics of target populations. Our results suggest that species with high per capita fecundity (over discrete breeding periods), short juvenile stages, and fairly constant survivorship rates are most likely to respond undesirably to harvest. It is difficult to determine the extent to which overcompensation and instability could occur during real-world removal efforts, and more empirical removal studies should be undertaken to evaluate population-level responses to control harvests. Nevertheless, our results identify key issues that have been seldom acknowledged and are potentially generic across taxa.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 4%
Brazil 2 1%
South Africa 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Japan 2 1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 146 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 20%
Student > Master 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Other 10 6%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 24 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 50%
Environmental Science 44 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 29 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#1,854
of 3,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,363
of 102,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#13
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.