↓ Skip to main content

Banff 2013 Meeting Report: Inclusion of C4d-Negative Antibody-Mediated Rejection and Antibody-Associated Arterial Lesions

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Transplantation, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
patent
8 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
guideline
4 clinical guideline sources
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
477 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Banff 2013 Meeting Report: Inclusion of C4d-Negative Antibody-Mediated Rejection and Antibody-Associated Arterial Lesions
Published in
American Journal of Transplantation, February 2014
DOI 10.1111/ajt.12590
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 477 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 468 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 75 16%
Other 56 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 12%
Student > Master 38 8%
Student > Postgraduate 38 8%
Other 112 23%
Unknown 103 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 244 51%
Immunology and Microbiology 33 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 1%
Other 26 5%
Unknown 122 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2025.
All research outputs
#1,584,440
of 33,704,742 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Transplantation
#362
of 6,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,190
of 372,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Transplantation
#6
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,704,742 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.