↓ Skip to main content

When is correlation coevolution?

Overview of attention for article published in The American Naturalist, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
238 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
When is correlation coevolution?
Published in
The American Naturalist, May 2010
DOI 10.1086/651591
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Studying the correlation between traits of interacting species has long been a popular approach for identifying putative cases of coevolution. More recently, such approaches have been used as a means to evaluate support for the geographic mosaic theory of coevolution. Here we examine the utility of these approaches, using mathematical and computational models to predict the correlation that evolves between traits of interacting species for a broad range of interaction types. Our results reveal that coevolution is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for the evolution of spatially correlated traits between two species. Specifically, our results show that coevolutionary selection fails to consistently generate statistically significant correlations and, conversely, that non-coevolutionary processes can readily cause statistically significant correlations to evolve. In addition, our results demonstrate that studies of trait correlations per se cannot be used as evidence either for or against a geographic mosaic process. Taken together, our results suggest that understanding the coevolutionary process in natural populations will require detailed mechanistic studies conducted in multiple populations or the use of more sophisticated statistical approaches that better use information contained in existing data sets.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 10 4%
United Kingdom 5 2%
Canada 3 1%
Brazil 3 1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 207 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 53 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 22%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Professor 21 9%
Student > Master 19 8%
Other 46 19%
Unknown 23 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 153 64%
Environmental Science 22 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 <1%
Other 10 4%
Unknown 33 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2018.
All research outputs
#5,910,837
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from The American Naturalist
#1,030
of 4,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,257
of 150,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The American Naturalist
#8
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.