↓ Skip to main content

Transfusions in the Less Severely Injured: Does Age of Transfused Blood Affect Outcomes?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Trauma, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
patent
35 patents
guideline
2 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Transfusions in the Less Severely Injured: Does Age of Transfused Blood Affect Outcomes?
Published in
Journal of Trauma, October 2008
DOI 10.1097/ta.0b013e318184aa11
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Prior studies have demonstrated that transfusion of older stored blood is associated with an increased risk of multiple organ failure, infection, and death. These reports were primarily comprised of severely injured patients, and it remains unknown whether this phenomenon is observed in relatively less injured patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between the age of stored blood and the morbidity and mortality in a mild to moderately injured patient cohort.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 82 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 16%
Researcher 14 16%
Other 9 10%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 21 24%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 59%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Engineering 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 16 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2026.
All research outputs
#3,649,985
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Trauma
#369
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,427
of 143,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Trauma
#8
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.